Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-06-05 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black and Green | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot better than OPPO Reno, with a 98.9 score against 72.8. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has an older 13 version while OPPO Reno has Android 9.0 Pie version. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a newer and just a little thinner device than the OPPO Reno, but it's also heavier.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a little sharper display than OPPO Reno, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088px, a just a bit better display pixel density and a little bigger display. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a bit better processor than OPPO Reno, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features more memory capacity to store more apps and games than OPPO Reno, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a superior camera than OPPO Reno, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for capturing images and videos in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a much more megapixels back camera, a way bigger sensor which gives a way better image and video quality and a way better 7680x4320 video quality.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with better battery lifetime than OPPO Reno, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.