Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2019-06-05 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and Green | Black, Pink and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 5.68 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 3 is better than the OPPO Reno, having a general score of 81.2 against 72.8. The Galaxy Note 3 is an way older device than the OPPO Reno, but Samsung managed to build it just a little lighter and a little thinner anyway. These devices have Android OS, but Galaxy Note 3 has an older 5.0 version and OPPO Reno has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Galaxy Note 3 has a CPU that's very similar to OPPO Reno's processing unit, because although the Galaxy Note 3 has an inferior number of cores and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with an additional GPU. Galaxy Note 3 counts with just a bit better looking display than OPPO Reno, although it has a quite inferior pixel number in each inch of screen, a bit smaller display and a bit lower 1920 x 1080 resolution.
The OPPO Reno captures much better videos and photos than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same video quality, the OPPO Reno also has a way bigger camera sensor, a much bigger aperture for better low light photography and video and a lot higher resolution back-facing camera.
The OPPO Reno has a much bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. The OPPO Reno counts with just a little better battery duration than Galaxy Note 3, because it has 3765mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.