Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 5.1 |
| 2019-06-05 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black and Green | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 5.68 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 5 is slightly better than the OPPO Reno, having a 79.3 score against 72.8. These phones come with Android OS, but Galaxy Note 5 has the older 5.1 version and OPPO Reno has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Galaxy Note 5 design is just a little bit lighter and somewhat thinner than OPPO Reno, even though it was released many years before.
The OPPO Reno features a bit faster processor than Galaxy Note 5, because it has more RAM and 7 more processing cores. Samsung Galaxy Note 5 features a sharper display than OPPO Reno, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per display inch and a higher 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution.
OPPO Reno features a way bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy Note 5, because it has more internal memory capacity. The OPPO Reno has a superior camera than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the OPPO Reno also has a camera in the back with a lot better resolution, a larger diafragm aperture to take better captures and video in low light environments and a way bigger sensor.
The OPPO Reno has greater battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 26% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.