Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-06-05 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black and Green | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition is much better than OPPO Reno, getting an 80.4 score against 72.8. Although the Galaxy Note Fan Edition is older than OPPO Reno, it's construction is just a little bit lighter and somewhat thinner. Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a little more vivid screen than OPPO Reno, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixel density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
OPPO Reno has a very superior storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition's CPU is very similar to the processing unit in OPPO Reno, and although the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
OPPO Reno has a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the same diafragm aperture and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the OPPO Reno also has a larger back camera sensor providing a higher image quality and a way more megapixels back-facing camera.
OPPO Reno has a bit better battery life than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 3765mAh of battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.