Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-06-05 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black and Green | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note10 is much better than the OPPO Reno, having a score of 89 against 72.8. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Note10 and the OPPO Reno were released only 3 months apart, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 is somewhat thinner and just a little bit lighter. Galaxy Note10 counts with a screen that's just as good as the display in OPPO Reno, although the Galaxy Note10 has a little lower pixel density, a little bit smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2280px.
The Galaxy Note10's storage capacity to store more games and applications is just as good as the OPPO Reno one, both have equal 256 GB internal storage. Samsung Galaxy Note10 counts with a little faster processor than OPPO Reno. Both of them have a Octa-Core processing unit and a 8 GB RAM memory. OPPO Reno shoots much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for capturing photographs and/or video in poorly lited environments and lower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the OPPO Reno also counts with a back-facing camera with lot more mega-pixels and a much larger back camera sensor capturing way higher quality pictures and videos.
OPPO Reno counts with just a bit longer battery life than Galaxy Note10, because it has a 3765mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.