Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-06-05 | 2020-01-21 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black and Green | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 Lite is better than OPPO Reno, having an 86.2 score against 72.8. Although Galaxy Note10 Lite and OPPO Reno were released only a few months apart, the Galaxy Note10 Lite construction is a little thinner but also a little heavier than OPPO Reno. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Note10 Lite has 11 version and OPPO Reno has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite features just a bit better hardware performance than OPPO Reno, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has a display that is very similar to OPPO Reno's screen, because although the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has a quite worse amount of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a little bit larger display and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400.
OPPO Reno features a superior camera than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has slower video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the OPPO Reno also counts with a much higher resolution back camera and a much bigger camera sensor shooting lot better quality photos and videos.
The Galaxy Note10 Lite features a better memory for games and applications than OPPO Reno, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has superior battery duration than OPPO Reno, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3765mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.