Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2019-06-05 | 2013-09-25 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and Green | Black, Pink and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note3 has an overall score of 77.7, which is slightly better than OPPO Reno's 72.8 global score. Although Samsung Galaxy Note3 is extremely older than OPPO Reno, it's construction is a little lighter and just a bit thinner. Both devices in this comparison review have Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Note3 has an older 4.4.2 version while OPPO Reno has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The OPPO Reno has a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a just a bit better display density, a quite bigger display and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2340. OPPO Reno counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy Note3, because it has a greater number of cores and a larger amount of RAM memory.
OPPO Reno takes greater photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note3, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the OPPO Reno also has a much larger sensor which offers a way better photo and video quality, a much larger aperture and a much higher 48 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera.
OPPO Reno counts with a way bigger memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. OPPO Reno features a little longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has an 18 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.