Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-06-05 | 2017-09-15 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Black and Green | Deep Sea blue, Maple gold, Midnight black and Orchid gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 440.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note8 is better than OPPO Reno, getting a overall score of 83 against 72.8. Galaxy Note8 is an older and just a bit heavier phone than the OPPO Reno, but Samsung managed to make it a little bit thinner anyway. These phones have the same Android 9.0 Pie OS, so both should offer all the same operating system features.
Galaxy Note8 features a little bit better looking screen than OPPO Reno, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher count of pixels per inch in the screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels. OPPO Reno has a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note8, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
The Galaxy Note8 has a little better performance than OPPO Reno, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. OPPO Reno has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note8, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same aperture, the OPPO Reno also has a back camera with a much better resolution and a way larger sensor which provides a much higher image and video quality.
The OPPO Reno counts with just a little bit longer battery life than Galaxy Note8, because it has 3765mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.