Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-06-05 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black and Green | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 Lite is a lot better than the OPPO Reno, getting a score of 89.7 against 72.8. The Galaxy S10 Lite body is a little bit thinner but just a little bit heavier than the OPPO Reno, and they were only released 8 months apart. OPPO Reno and Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite both have quite similar displays, because although the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a just a bit lower pixels density, it also counts with a bit bigger display and a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has more memory to install applications and games than OPPO Reno, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a bit faster CPU than OPPO Reno. Both of them have a 8 GB RAM memory and 8 cores.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite takes slightly better pictures and videos than OPPO Reno, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for shooting pictures or videos in low light situations, and they both have a camera in the back with a 48 MP resolution, the same video definition and a same size camera sensor, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with faster video frame rate.
Galaxy S10 Lite has greater battery performance than OPPO Reno, because it has a 20 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.