Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-06-05 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Black and Green | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10e has a global score of 86.3, which is much better than OPPO Reno's general score of 72.8. The Galaxy S10e construction is somewhat thinner and lighter than the OPPO Reno, even though they were released only 3 months apart. The Galaxy S10e has a bit better processor than OPPO Reno, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with a little bit better display than OPPO Reno, because although it has a little smaller screen and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels, it also counts with a bit better pixels quantity per inch of screen. The Samsung Galaxy S10e has just a bit more storage capacity for games and applications than OPPO Reno, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 512 GB.
The OPPO Reno has a better camera than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for shooting photographs in low light environments and slower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the OPPO Reno also counts with a much bigger sensor which offers a lot better image and video quality and a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels.
OPPO Reno counts with better battery duration than Galaxy S10e, because it has a 21% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.