Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-06-05 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black and Green | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 FE is way better than OPPO Reno, getting a 90.8 score against 72.8. Although the Galaxy S20 FE is a little heavier than the OPPO Reno, it's a little thinner and newer. Both of these phones use Android OS, but Galaxy S20 FE has the previous 11 version and OPPO Reno has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Galaxy S20 FE features a bit better screen than OPPO Reno, because it has a quite bigger display, a bit greater display density and a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution. Galaxy S20 FE has a quite bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than OPPO Reno, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1000 GB.
Galaxy S20 FE counts with a bit better processing power than OPPO Reno, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. OPPO Reno has a bit better camera than Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has a smaller sensor and lower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the OPPO Reno also counts with a larger camera aperture for better low light images and video and a way higher 48 mega-pixels resolution back camera.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE features improved battery duration than OPPO Reno, because it has a 20 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.