Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-06-05 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black and Green | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a score of 98, which is much better than OPPO Reno's score of 72.8. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G body has the same thickness than OPPO Reno, but it is heavier. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has older 13 version while OPPO Reno has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a bit better hardware performance than OPPO Reno, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has 4 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a little more vivid screen than OPPO Reno, because it has more pixels per inch in the screen, a little bit bigger screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than OPPO Reno, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1000 GB. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a superior camera than OPPO Reno, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for capturing pictures and videos in low light situations, and they both have a same size camera sensor, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also counts with a much higher video definition and a much better resolution back camera.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has better battery duration than OPPO Reno, because it has a 33% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.