Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12 |
| 2019-06-05 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Black and Green | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a score of 95.4, which is much better than the OPPO Reno's general score of 72.8. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has the previous 13 version while OPPO Reno has Android 9.0 Pie. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra's design has the same thickness than OPPO Reno, but it is heavier.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with just a little better hardware performance than OPPO Reno. Both of them have 8 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core processing unit. Galaxy S22 Ultra features a much sharper display than OPPO Reno, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels, a just a little higher display pixels density and a quite bigger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a superior camera than OPPO Reno, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for shooting photographs and/or video in low light environments, it also counts with a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a lot bigger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a back camera with much more megapixels.
The OPPO Reno counts with a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has 128 GB more internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features better battery duration than OPPO Reno, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3765mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.