Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-06-05 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black and Green | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 Active is just a bit better than OPPO Reno, having a 75.8 score against 72.8. The Galaxy S7 Active body weights the same than the OPPO Reno, but it is somewhat thicker. OPPO Reno has a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has more RAM memory and a greater number of faster cores.
Galaxy S7 Active has a much better looking screen than OPPO Reno, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a higher display pixel density. The OPPO Reno has a much better storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy S7 Active counts with a little longer battery duration than OPPO Reno, because it has a 6% greater battery size. The OPPO Reno shoots greater photos and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rates, the OPPO Reno also has a way higher 48 MP resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.