Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-06-05 | 2017-04-21 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Black and Green | Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 173.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S8 has a score of 81.7, which is better than the OPPO Reno's 72.8 score. Even though the Samsung Galaxy S8 is incredibly older than the OPPO Reno, it's construction is somewhat lighter and thinner. The Galaxy S8 has a bit better screen than OPPO Reno, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2960px resolution and a better count of pixels per inch in the screen.
The OPPO Reno features a much greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S8, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The OPPO Reno and the Samsung Galaxy S8 feature quite similar CPUs, and although the Samsung Galaxy S8 has less RAM, they both have 8 cores.
The OPPO Reno features greater battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S8, because it has a 3765mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh. OPPO Reno shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S8, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the OPPO Reno also has a lot more MP back facing camera and a much bigger camera sensor providing a way higher image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.