Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-06-05 | 2017-08-11 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black and Green | Gold and Gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S8 Active is much better than the OPPO Reno, with an 81.9 score against 72.8. Although Galaxy S8 Active is better than OPPO Reno, we must note that it is also older, somewhat thicker and heavier. Galaxy S8 Active counts with a bit more vivid display than OPPO Reno, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixels count in each inch of screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 2960px.
OPPO Reno counts with much more storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy S8 Active features a CPU that is just as good as OPPO Reno's processor, and although the Samsung Galaxy S8 Active has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The Galaxy S8 Active has a bit superior battery performance than OPPO Reno, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity. OPPO Reno shoots better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the same (4K) video quality and a same size camera aperture, the OPPO Reno also has a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor taking much higher quality videos and photographs and a lot more MP camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.