Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-06-05 | 2021-03-12 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 5.79 x 2.82 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black and Green | Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 311 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Mali-G52 MP1 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover 5 is a little bit better than the OPPO Reno, getting a 78.1 score against 72.8. Samsung Galaxy XCover 5's design is newer and a bit lighter, but just a little bit thicker than the OPPO Reno. These phones have Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy XCover 5 has an older 11 version and OPPO Reno has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The OPPO Reno features a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the OPPO Reno also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The OPPO Reno counts with a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a higher amount of pixels per display inch, a much higher 1080 x 2340px resolution and a bigger screen.
The OPPO Reno features a slightly bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy XCover 5, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The OPPO Reno has a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light photos and videos, a lot higher video quality and a lot higher 48 mega pixels resolution back camera.
OPPO Reno counts with better battery duration than Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a 26% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.