Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 12 |
| 2019-06-05 | 2022-06-29 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 8.29 ounces |
| Black and Green | -- |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has a score of 77.6, which is a bit better than OPPO Reno's 72.8 score. Although Galaxy XCover 6 Pro is noticeably newer than OPPO Reno, it's notably heavier and somewhat thicker. Both phones we are comparing here include Android operating system, but the Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has an older 12 version while OPPO Reno has Android 9.0 Pie version.
OPPO Reno has a much powerful processor than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno also has 2 GB more RAM memory. OPPO Reno counts with a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a little smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a little better count of pixels in each inch in the screen.
The OPPO Reno features a very superior camera than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a lesser megapixels resolution camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better photography in poorly lited situations and a way bigger back camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro features a bigger storage to install games and applications than OPPO Reno, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1 TB. The Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has a bit superior battery life than OPPO Reno, because it has an 8 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.