Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-06-05 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black and Green | Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 403 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a general score of 80.1, which is just a bit better than the OPPO Reno's 72.8 general score. Galaxy XCover FieldPro's construction is newer than the OPPO Reno's, but it's heavier and incredibly thicker. Both of these devices include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy XCover FieldPro has older 8.0 Oreo version while OPPO Reno has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit better processing unit than OPPO Reno, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit sharper screen than OPPO Reno, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixel density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
The OPPO Reno takes much better pictures and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for taking pictures and/or video in low-light environments, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 video resolution, a lot higher 48 mega-pixels resolution back camera and a lot larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
OPPO Reno counts with more memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity. Galaxy XCover FieldPro has better battery life than OPPO Reno, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3765mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.