Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-06-05 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black and Green | Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover Pro is much better than OPPO Reno, with an 81 score against 72.8. Although it's the best in this review, the Galaxy XCover Pro is a somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier device than the OPPO Reno. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy XCover Pro has older 11 version and OPPO Reno has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features a screen that's just as good as the OPPO Reno one, because although the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a bit smaller display, and they both have the same 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a just a little greater display density. The Galaxy XCover Pro has a CPU that is very similar to OPPO Reno's processing unit, and although the Galaxy XCover Pro has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The OPPO Reno shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have the same aperture, the OPPO Reno also has a much better (4K) video definition, a lot better 48 mega pixels resolution camera and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor taking way better quality videos and photographs.
OPPO Reno features a better memory for games and applications than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has just a bit better battery performance than OPPO Reno, because it has an 8 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.