Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-06-05 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and Green | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a lot better than the OPPO Reno, with an 88.5 score against 72.8. Both phones in this comparison have Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has 12 version while OPPO Reno has Android 9.0 Pie. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a a little bit lighter and somewhat thinner cellphone than OPPO Reno, although both of them were released with only 8 months difference.
The Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit superior processing unit than OPPO Reno. They have 8 cpu cores and the same RAM amount. Galaxy Z Flip has a little bit better looking display than OPPO Reno, because it has a just a bit greater pixels amount per inch of screen, a little bigger display and a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2636.
The OPPO Reno features a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Reno also counts with a much larger sensor which gives a way higher photo and video quality, a back camera with much more megapixels and a bigger diafragm aperture.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip's memory capacity for games and applications is just as good as the OPPO Reno one, they have exactly the same 256 GB internal memory. OPPO Reno counts with a bit superior battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 3765mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.