Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-06-05 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and Green | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a score of 92.3, which is a lot better than OPPO Reno's 72.8 overall score. Both phones in this comparison work with Android OS, but the Galaxy Z Flip 5G has the older 11 version and OPPO Reno has Android 9.0 Pie version. Galaxy Z Flip 5G's construction is newer, thinner and a bit lighter than OPPO Reno.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit sharper screen than OPPO Reno, because it has a quite bigger display, a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2636px and a quite better pixel number in each inch in the display. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit faster processing unit than OPPO Reno. Both have 8 CPU cores and 8 GB of RAM memory.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G and OPPO Reno both feature similar memory for applications, games, photos and videos, both of them have equal internal memory capacity. OPPO Reno captures better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the OPPO Reno also counts with a back-facing camera with a way higher resolution, a larger aperture to capture better images in poorly lited situations and a much larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
OPPO Reno features a little longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 3765mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.