Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-06-05 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Black and Green | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is way better than OPPO Reno, getting a score of 94.6 against 72.8. These devices use Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has the older 11 version and OPPO Reno has Android 9.0 Pie version. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2's body is newer and much thinner, but also notably heavier than OPPO Reno.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 and OPPO Reno both have really similar displays, because although the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a bit inferior pixel count in each display inch, it also counts with a bigger screen and a higher 1768 x 2208 resolution. OPPO Reno and Galaxy Z Fold 2 count with very similar storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos, both have equal internal storage capacity.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a little bit better performance than OPPO Reno, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a larger amount of RAM. OPPO Reno counts with a better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a tinier camera sensor taking less light and duller colors and lower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same video definition, the OPPO Reno also counts with a bigger camera aperture for better captures in low-light environments and a much higher resolution camera in the back.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features improved battery performance than OPPO Reno, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.