Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Sony |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-06-05 | 2017-06-01 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.14 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Black and Green | Black, Pink, Red and Silver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 801 pixels per inch |
| -- | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 3230mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Sony Xperia XZ Premium is a bit better than OPPO Reno, getting a overall score of 79.8 against 72.8. Even though the Sony Xperia XZ Premium is a lot older and just a little heavier than the OPPO Reno, it's design is still thinner. Xperia XZ Premium has a much more vibrant display than OPPO Reno, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher resolution of 2160 x 3840 and a lot more pixels per screen inch.
The Xperia XZ Premium has a little faster processing unit than OPPO Reno, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. The OPPO Reno features a much bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Sony Xperia XZ Premium, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity.
OPPO Reno has a much better camera than Xperia XZ Premium, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the OPPO Reno also has a larger diafragm aperture, a camera with lot more mega pixels and a bigger sensor taking higher quality videos and photos.
The OPPO Reno counts with just a little better battery duration than Xperia XZ Premium, because it has a 17% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.