Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Sony |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-06-05 | 2018-04-05 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and Green | 16 777 216 |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 483 pixels per inch |
| -- | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xperia XZ2 Compact is just a bit better than the OPPO Reno, with a score of 79 against 72.8. Despite of the fact Xperia XZ2 Compact is older and thicker than OPPO Reno, it's design is still a bit lighter. These phones have Android operating system, but the Xperia XZ2 Compact has the previous 8.0 Oreo version while OPPO Reno has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Xperia XZ2 Compact has a better looking screen than OPPO Reno, because although it has a little worse 1080 x 2160 resolution and a much smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixels count per inch of display. OPPO Reno counts with a bigger storage for games and applications than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory.
The Xperia XZ2 Compact has a bit more powerful processing unit than OPPO Reno, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. The OPPO Reno has superior battery life than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has 3765mAh of battery capacity instead of 2870mAh. OPPO Reno has a slightly better camera than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because although it has worse video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Reno also counts with a larger back camera sensor which provides a higher photo and video quality, a way higher 48 megapixels resolution camera in the back and a bigger diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.