Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Sony |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-06-05 | 2018-07-30 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.22 x 3.15 x 0.47 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 8.32 ounces |
| Black and Green | 16 777 216 |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 760 pixels per inch |
| -- | 900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 3540mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia XZ2 Premium has an overall score of 82.2, which is better than the OPPO Reno's overall score of 72.8. Xperia XZ2 Premium is an older, extremely heavier and incredibly thicker phone than the OPPO Reno. The Xperia XZ2 Premium counts with a much better display than OPPO Reno, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way better display pixel density and a lot better resolution of 2160 x 3840px.
The OPPO Reno has a quite bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory. The Xperia XZ2 Premium counts with a little bit better processing power than OPPO Reno, although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The OPPO Reno features a superior camera than Xperia XZ2 Premium, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Reno also has a lot higher 48 mega pixels resolution back camera, a larger aperture for better low-light photography and video and a larger camera sensor which gives a higher image and video quality.
The OPPO Reno features just a little bit longer battery performance than Xperia XZ2 Premium, because it has 3765mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.