Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Sony |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-06-05 | 2017-04-05 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.68 ounces |
| Black and Green | Black, Blue and Silver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xperia XZs is slightly better than OPPO Reno, getting a score of 77.2 against 72.8. Xperia XZs is an extremely older cellphone than OPPO Reno, but Sony managed to make it lighter and a little thinner. OPPO Reno has a little faster processor than Xperia XZs, because it has a higher number of 2.2 GHz cores and 4 GB more RAM.
Xperia XZs features a display that's just as good as the OPPO Reno one, because although the Xperia XZs has a quite smaller screen and a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920px, it also counts with a just a bit greater screen density. The Xperia XZs takes better photographs and videos than OPPO Reno, although it has a lower 3840x2160 video resolution, a tinier back camera sensor, a tinier aperture which is not so good for capturing pictures and/or video in poorly lited situations and a camera with a lot worse resolution.
The OPPO Reno features a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Xperia XZs, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. OPPO Reno has improved battery performance than Xperia XZs, because it has a 30 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.