Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 82.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-06-05 | 2019-03-28 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.44 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Black and Green | Black and Silver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 is much better than the OPPO Reno, getting a global score of 82.3 against 72.8. Both phones in this comparison have Android operating system, but Xiaomi Black Shark 2 has the previous 10 version while OPPO Reno has Android 9.0 Pie version. Xiaomi Black Shark 2's design has the same thickness than the OPPO Reno, but it's just a little heavier.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 counts with a bit better processing power than OPPO Reno. They have the same number of cores and a 8 GB RAM memory. The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 counts with a bit more vivid display than OPPO Reno. Both of them have a higher pixel quantity in each inch of screen, a display of the same size and exactly the same 1080 x 2340 resolution.
The OPPO Reno and the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 both feature incredibly similar cameras, and although the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for taking photos in low-light situations, they both have the same video frame rate, a same resolution camera in the back, the same sensor size and the same video resolution.
OPPO Reno features a superior memory for apps and games than Xiaomi Black Shark 2, because it has more internal storage. The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 features a bit longer battery lifetime than OPPO Reno, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.