Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-06-05 | 2018-04-03 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black and Green | Black and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 639.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is better than OPPO Reno, with an 83.8 score against 72.8. Despite of the fact Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is older and just a bit heavier than OPPO Reno, it's design is still a little bit thinner. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a screen that is just as good as the OPPO Reno one, although the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a little bit smaller screen, a just a bit worse quantity of pixels per inch in the display and a little worse 1080 x 2160 pixels resolution.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s's memory capacity for games and applications is just as good as OPPO Reno's one, they have exactly the same 256 GB internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with a bit better CPU than OPPO Reno. Both of them have 8 processing cores and a 8 GB RAM memory. OPPO Reno counts with a much better camera than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the OPPO Reno also has a lot larger camera sensor taking much higher quality pictures, a lot higher resolution camera in the back and a larger camera aperture for better photography in poorly lited environments.
OPPO Reno counts with just a bit longer battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has a 3765mAh battery capacity against 3400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.