Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-06-05 | 2020-09-08 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Black and Green | Cobalt blue and Shadow gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a global score of 81.6, which is better than the OPPO Reno's 72.8 overall score. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android OS, but the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has an older 10 version and OPPO Reno has Android 9.0 Pie. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC is a newer phone than the OPPO Reno, although it is somewhat heavier and just a bit thicker.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a bit more powerful processor than OPPO Reno, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with just a bit better looking display than OPPO Reno, because although it has a bit worse pixels density, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a quite bigger display.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a slightly better camera than OPPO Reno, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also counts with a larger back camera sensor providing a better image quality and a camera with a much better resolution.
The OPPO Reno has much more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a much longer battery performance than OPPO Reno, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.