Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-06-05 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black and Green | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a global score of 81.1, which is better than the OPPO Reno's score of 72.8. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro design has the same thickness than OPPO Reno, but it is heavier. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has the older 10 version while OPPO Reno has Android 9.0 Pie version.
OPPO Reno counts with a little bit better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little better pixels density. OPPO Reno has more memory to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a little better hardware performance than OPPO Reno, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has greater battery lifetime than OPPO Reno, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a bit better camera than OPPO Reno, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a way more megapixels camera and a bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.