Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-06-05 | 2020-04-07 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black and Green | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 616 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3765mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a global score of 79, which is slightly better than the OPPO Reno's score of 72.8. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is a heavier phone than OPPO Reno, but they are 0.35inches thick. Both phones we are comparing here work with Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has an older 11 version and OPPO Reno has Android 9.0 Pie.
The OPPO Reno has a little more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a little bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per screen inch. The OPPO Reno counts with a greater storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S and OPPO Reno feature very similar processors, and although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has 4 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The OPPO Reno and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S both feature quite similar cameras, and although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a tinier diafragm aperture, they both have a same size back-facing camera sensor, the same video definition, the same video frame rate and a same resolution back-facing camera.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has greater battery lifetime than OPPO Reno, because it has a 5020mAh battery size against 3765mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.