Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-18 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Luminous black, Ocean blue and Sunset pink | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.34 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel XL has an overall score of 81.3, which is just a bit better than the OPPO Reno2's 73.9 general score. The Google Pixel XL is an extremely older phone than the OPPO Reno2, but it is a little bit thinner and lighter anyway. The OPPO Reno2 has just a bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel XL, because it has a higher number of faster cores and a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Google Pixel XL counts with a little more vivid screen than OPPO Reno2, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixels count per inch in the screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px. The OPPO Reno2 counts with a better camera than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the OPPO Reno2 also has a larger sensor, a bigger aperture and a camera with lot more MP.
The OPPO Reno2 features a superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel XL, because it has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB and 256 GB internal memory capacity. OPPO Reno2 features a little longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel XL, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3450mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.