Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-10-18 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Luminous black, Ocean blue and Sunset pink | Aurora black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ has an overall score of 83.7, which is much better than OPPO Reno2's 73.9 global score. LG V50 ThinQ is a just a little bit lighter and somewhat thinner phone than OPPO Reno2, although both were released with only 5 months difference. These phones use the same Android 10 OS, so they should give identical operating system features.
LG V50 ThinQ features a bit superior CPU than OPPO Reno2, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a slightly better looking screen than OPPO Reno2, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixels density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px.
OPPO Reno2 has a better camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture and worse 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the OPPO Reno2 also counts with a much more mega pixels camera and a way larger sensor taking way higher quality videos and photos.
OPPO Reno2 has just a bit more memory for apps and games than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB more internal storage capacity. LG V50 ThinQ's battery life is very similar to OPPO Reno2's battery lifetime.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.