Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2019-10-18 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Luminous black, Ocean blue and Sunset pink | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.34 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Droid Turbo is a bit better than OPPO Reno2, with a score of 76.4 against 73.9. Although the Motorola Droid Turbo is way older and somewhat thicker than the OPPO Reno2, it's design is still a bit lighter. Both phones in our current comparison use Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Droid Turbo has a more recent 4.4.4 version and OPPO Reno2 has Android 10, providing the user some extra features.
The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a much better display than OPPO Reno2, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and a greater number of pixels per inch in the display. Motorola Droid Turbo has a bit faster processor than OPPO Reno2, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of cores (although they are faster), it also counts with an additional graphics processing unit.
The OPPO Reno2 counts with a better camera than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Reno2 also has a way more megapixels back camera, faster video frame rates and a larger aperture. OPPO Reno2 counts with a much bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB and 224 GB more internal storage.
OPPO Reno2 features a bit superior battery performance than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a 3% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.