Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2019-10-18 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Luminous black, Ocean blue and Sunset pink | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.34 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola DROID Turbo is slightly better than OPPO Reno2, with a score of 77.9 against 73.9. Despite of the fact Motorola DROID Turbo is notably older and somewhat thicker than the OPPO Reno2, it's body is still just a bit lighter. Both phones in this comparison come with Android OS, but the Motorola DROID Turbo has 4.4.4 version and OPPO Reno2 has Android 10 version, so it offers a couple nice extra features.
The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a brighter screen than OPPO Reno2, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a better screen density and a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440. The Motorola DROID Turbo features just a little better performance than OPPO Reno2, because although it has lesser CPU cores (although they are faster) and less RAM, it also counts with an additional graphics processor.
The OPPO Reno2 counts with a better camera than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same video quality, the OPPO Reno2 also has better video frame rates, a larger camera aperture and a back-facing camera with lot more megapixels. OPPO Reno2 features a superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 512 GB.
The OPPO Reno2 features a little longer battery duration than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.