Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android |
| 2019-10-18 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Luminous black, Ocean blue and Sunset pink | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | TFT |
| 405 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A32 has an overall score of 84.7, which is much better than the OPPO Reno2's 73.9 global score. The Galaxy A32 comes with Android operating system, and OPPO Reno2 comes with Android 10 operating system. The Galaxy A32 construction is newer and just a little thinner than the OPPO Reno2's, but it is also a bit heavier.
OPPO Reno2 features a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A32, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the OPPO Reno2 also has 4 GB more RAM. The OPPO Reno2 features a better looking display than Galaxy A32, and although they both have a display with the same size, the OPPO Reno2 also has a lot better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a higher pixels number in each inch of screen.
OPPO Reno2 counts with a much better memory for games and applications than Galaxy A32, because although it has an external memory slot that admits up to 512 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy A32 has better battery life than OPPO Reno2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
OPPO Reno2 features a slightly better camera than Galaxy A32, and although they both have a 48 mega pixels resolution camera, the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the OPPO Reno2 also has a larger camera aperture to take better low-light photography and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.