Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 82.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-10-18 | 2019-06-20 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Luminous black, Ocean blue and Sunset pink | Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.34 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A60 is much better than the OPPO Reno2, having an 82.3 score against 73.9. Both of these phones include Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A60 has newer 11 version while OPPO Reno2 has Android 10 version, so it provides some extra features and performance optimizations. The Samsung Galaxy A60 is a somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter phone than the OPPO Reno2, even when they were released with only a few months difference.
Samsung Galaxy A60 counts with a display that is just as good as OPPO Reno2's display, because although the Samsung Galaxy A60 has a little worse 1080 x 2340 resolution and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little greater pixel density. The OPPO Reno2 has much more memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A60, because it has an external SD slot that allows up to 512 GB and 128 GB more internal storage.
The OPPO Reno2 features just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A60, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OPPO Reno2 also has more RAM memory. OPPO Reno2 shoots better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A60, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates, the same diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the OPPO Reno2 also has a way bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a back-facing camera with a much higher 48 mega-pixels resolution.
The OPPO Reno2 has longer battery life than Galaxy A60, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.