Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-18 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Luminous black, Ocean blue and Sunset pink | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G has a general score of 91.8, which is way better than the OPPO Reno2's 73.9 overall score. Both devices in this review have Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A71 5G has a more recent 11 version and OPPO Reno2 has Android 10, so it offers lots of additional features. The Galaxy A71 5G body is thinner and just a little bit lighter than the OPPO Reno2, although both of them were released only a couple of months apart.
Galaxy A71 5G features a bit superior processor than OPPO Reno2, although it has less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Galaxy A71 5G features a display that's very similar to the OPPO Reno2 one, because although the Galaxy A71 5G has a little bit lower screen density, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400, it also counts with a little bit larger screen.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G features a slightly better camera than OPPO Reno2, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for low light captures and video, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a bigger back camera sensor taking higher quality pictures and a camera in the back with a much better resolution.
The OPPO Reno2 has a greater memory for games and applications than Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 512 GB against 1000 GB, it also counts with 128 GB more internal storage capacity. Galaxy A71 5G has a bit superior battery duration than OPPO Reno2, because it has a 13 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.