Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-10-18 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Luminous black, Ocean blue and Sunset pink | Black and Gold |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy C9 Pro has a general score of 81, which is slightly better than OPPO Reno2's general score of 73.9. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy C9 Pro has a newer 6.0 Marshmallow version and OPPO Reno2 has Android 10 version, providing a couple additional features and a performance increase. Although Galaxy C9 Pro is extremely older than OPPO Reno2, it's design is a lot thinner and just a little bit lighter.
OPPO Reno2 features a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the OPPO Reno2 also has a greater amount of RAM. The OPPO Reno2 has a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a bit bigger display, a little bit better pixel density and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
OPPO Reno2 has a superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has an external memory card slot that supports up to 512 GB and more internal memory. OPPO Reno2 has a much better camera than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a much better 48 megapixels resolution camera in the back and a bigger diafragm aperture.
Galaxy C9 Pro has a battery duration that's very similar to the OPPO Reno2 one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.