Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Vivo |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-10-18 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Luminous black, Ocean blue and Sunset pink | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.34 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a global score of 77.8, which is just a bit better than OPPO Reno2's 73.9 score. These devices come with Android OS (operating system), but the vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a more recent 14 version and OPPO Reno2 has Android 10. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro's construction is extremely newer and way thinner than the OPPO Reno2's, but it is also heavier.
The OPPO Reno2 features a much better performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a way better screen than OPPO Reno2, because it has a much higher 2200 x 2480px resolution, a larger display and a little more pixels per inch in the screen.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features slightly more storage capacity for games and applications than OPPO Reno2, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots much clearer photographs and videos than OPPO Reno2, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a lot larger back-facing camera sensor providing a much better image quality, a better 50 megapixels resolution back facing camera and a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a superior battery performance than OPPO Reno2, because it has a 43 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.