Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-18 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Luminous black, Ocean blue and Sunset pink | Black, Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a score of 85.5, which is much better than OPPO Reno2's 73.9 score. Even though Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is older than OPPO Reno2, it's construction is a little lighter and a bit thinner. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a little more vivid display than OPPO Reno2, although it has a little bit worse quantity of pixels per screen inch, a little smaller display and a little bit worse 1080 x 2246 resolution.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a bit superior processing unit than OPPO Reno2. Both have 8 GB of RAM memory and 8 processing cores. OPPO Reno2 features a much better camera than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the OPPO Reno2 also counts with a back facing camera with a much higher resolution, a larger aperture to capture better low-light photography and a way larger sensor.
OPPO Reno2 counts with a little bit more storage to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, and although they both have exactly the same 256 GB internal storage, the OPPO Reno2 also has an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a battery lifetime that's very similar to OPPO Reno2's battery lifetime.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.