Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-03 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Nexus 6P has a global score of 80.3, which is better than OPPO Reno3 Pro's global score of 72. Google Nexus 6P's construction is just a little thinner than OPPO Reno3 Pro, although it is a little bit heavier and was released 4 years before. The OPPO Reno3 Pro has a bit more powerful CPU than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM.
OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a little sharper screen than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a bit inferior pixels count in each screen inch, it also counts with a quite larger screen. The OPPO Reno3 Pro features a much better camera than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a lot more mega-pixels back camera, a lot larger camera sensor and a larger diafragm aperture.
OPPO Reno3 Pro and Google Nexus 6P both count with quite similar memory for apps and games, both have equal 128 GB internal storage. OPPO Reno3 Pro features just a bit longer battery duration than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a 4025mAh battery size against 3450mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.