Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-03 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Black, Blue and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 is better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, with an 81.6 score against 72. The Google Pixel 2 construction is somewhat lighter and just a little thinner than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, although it was released many years before. The Google Pixel 2's CPU is just as good as the processing unit in OPPO Reno3 Pro, and although the Google Pixel 2 has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a bit more vivid screen than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a just a bit worse number of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bigger screen. The OPPO Reno3 Pro and the Google Pixel 2 both feature incredibly similar storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos, both of them have equal internal storage.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro shoots much better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have a same size aperture, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a way bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a much better image and video quality and a way higher 64 mega-pixels resolution back camera.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a much longer battery life than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 49% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.