Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-03 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel XL is much better than OPPO Reno3 Pro, with a overall score of 81.3 against 72. The Google Pixel XL is a notably older and just a little thicker cellphone than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, but Google managed to build it a little bit lighter anyway. OPPO Reno3 Pro features a bit better CPU than Google Pixel XL, because it has more RAM memory and a greater number of cores.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro features a little bit better screen than Google Pixel XL, because although it has a little worse 1080 x 2400 resolution and a just a bit worse screen density, it also counts with a larger display. OPPO Reno3 Pro features a much better camera than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a lot bigger back camera sensor taking way higher quality videos and photographs, a back facing camera with a lot higher 64 mega-pixels resolution and a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low light photos and video.
Google Pixel XL counts with as much memory to install games and applications as the OPPO Reno3 Pro, they have equal internal memory capacity. OPPO Reno3 Pro has a bit better battery performance than Google Pixel XL, because it has a 17% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.