Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | HTC |
| Android 10 | Android, HTC Sense UI |
| 2020-03-03 | 2018-01-17 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Black, Blue and Red |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 411 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3930mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
HTC U11 EYEs has a general score of 76.9, which is a little bit better than OPPO Reno3 Pro's general score of 72. Although it's the best phone in this review, the HTC U11 EYEs is an extremely older, just a little bit heavier and just a bit thicker phone than OPPO Reno3 Pro. HTC U11 EYEs comes with Android, HTC Sense UI operating system, while OPPO Reno3 Pro works with Android 10 operating system.
OPPO Reno3 Pro features a better looking display than HTC U11 EYEs, because it has a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, a little bit larger display and a bit greater quantity of pixels in each screen inch. The HTC U11 EYEs features a superior memory capacity for games and applications than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a bit faster processor than HTC U11 EYEs, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has 4 GB more RAM memory. The OPPO Reno3 Pro takes greater photographs and videos than HTC U11 EYEs, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video quality, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with a much higher resolution camera.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro features a bit longer battery duration than HTC U11 EYEs, because it has 4025mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.