Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-03 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V20 has a score of 77, which is just a bit better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro's overall score of 72. The LG V20 body is a bit thinner and a bit lighter than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a bit better processing unit than LG V20, because it has a larger amount of RAM and a greater number of faster cores.
OPPO Reno3 Pro has a little more vivid display than LG V20, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a quite worse screen pixels density, it also counts with a little larger screen. OPPO Reno3 Pro captures much clearer photographs and videos than LG V20, and although they both have the same video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a same size aperture, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a way larger sensor providing a way higher image quality and a back facing camera with lot more MP.
The LG V20 counts with much more storage capacity to store more games and applications than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with greater battery duration than LG V20, because it has a 26% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.