Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-03-03 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Aurora black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ has a general score of 83.7, which is better than OPPO Reno3 Pro's general score of 72. Even being the best phone in this review, the LG V50 ThinQ is an older, a little bit thicker and a bit heavier phone than the OPPO Reno3 Pro. Both of these devices work with the same Android 10 OS (Operating System).
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a bit faster processing unit than OPPO Reno3 Pro, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. OPPO Reno3 Pro features just a bit better looking screen than LG V50 ThinQ, although it has a way lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a just a little worse amount of pixels per inch of screen, they both have a same size display.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a very superior memory capacity for apps and games than OPPO Reno3 Pro, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a much better camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates and a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low-light images and videos, and they both have the same video definition, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with a back facing camera with a lot higher resolution and a lot larger back camera sensor capturing much higher quality videos and photographs.
The LG V50 ThinQ's battery life is very similar to the OPPO Reno3 Pro one, although the LG V50 ThinQ has just 4000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.