Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-03-03 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Black and Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Droid Turbo has a score of 76.4, which is a bit better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro's 72 score. Even being the best cellphone in our current comparison, it must be noted that it is also a way older, just a little bit heavier and notably thicker cellphone. These phones work with Android operating system, but Motorola Droid Turbo has newer 4.4.4 version while OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10 version.
The Motorola Droid Turbo features just a bit better performance than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has an inferior number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with an extra graphics co-processor. Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a little more vivid display than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better quantity of pixels per inch of display and a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution.
OPPO Reno3 Pro features much more memory to install games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity. OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a little better battery performance than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a 4025mAh battery capacity. OPPO Reno3 Pro captures greater photographs and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a larger camera aperture to take better photos and videos in poorly lited situations, higher 30 frames per second video frame rates and a back-facing camera with a lot better 64 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.