Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-03-03 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Black and Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola DROID Turbo is a bit better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, having a global score of 77.9 against 72. Even though the Motorola DROID Turbo is better than OPPO Reno3 Pro, it must be noted that it's also a older, just a little bit heavier and way thicker cellphone. These phones use Android operating system, but the Motorola DROID Turbo has 4.4.4 version and OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10, providing you a couple additional features and performance optimizations.
Motorola DROID Turbo has just a little better hardware performance than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and lesser cores , it also counts with a GPU. The Motorola DROID Turbo has just a bit better looking display than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and more pixels per inch in the display.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro takes a lot better photographs and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a larger diafragm aperture, better 30 frames per second video frame rates and a camera in the back with a much better 64 mega pixels resolution.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro has a very superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 128 GB internal memory. The OPPO Reno3 Pro features a bit longer battery duration than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 4025mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.